
Foundations of cohesive teams
In healthcare, teamwork is often spoken about as a value, yet experienced as a strain. Nurses and physicians work in environments marked by urgency, moral weight, cognitive overload, and frequent interruptions. Under these conditions, “team spirit” can sound like a soft concept—nice in theory, unrealistic in practice. But team cohesion is not an abstract morale booster; it is a clinical asset. It shapes decision-making, patient safety, staff retention, and psychological resilience.
Team spirit does not emerge from slogans, retreats, or forced positivity. It grows from everyday interactions that communicate trust, shared purpose, and psychological safety—often in small, overlooked moments.
Healthcare teams are uniquely vulnerable to fragmentation. Hierarchies are steep, time is scarce, and errors carry high emotional stakes. Chronic understaffing and administrative pressure further erode goodwill. When stress persists, clinicians unconsciously narrow their focus to task completion and self-protection. Communication becomes transactional. Curiosity about colleagues’ perspectives fades. Over time, this survival mode can harden into emotional distance.
Importantly, lack of team spirit is rarely about lack of commitment. Most clinicians care deeply. What deteriorates is the relational infrastructure that allows that care to be shared and sustained. Paramount is hierarchical support, fostering a culture that supports and promotes these values.
At the core of team spirit lies psychological safety—the sense that one can speak up, ask questions, admit uncertainty, or express concern without fear of humiliation or reprisal. In clinical environments, psychological safety is not optional. It directly affects diagnostic accuracy, error reporting, and ethical decision-making. Teams that function well normalize expressions of uncertainty and curiosity, understanding that humility and vigilance protect patients.
While leaders influence psychological safety, it is reinforced—or undermined—by daily peer-to-peer interactions. Every exchange either signals openness or defensiveness, inclusion or withdrawal.
Healthcare teams often assume a shared mission, yet rarely articulate it together. Under pressure, differences in priorities can surface: efficiency versus thoroughness, protocol versus judgment, speed versus relational care. Without a shared narrative, these differences can feel personal rather than functional. Teams that periodically reflect on what they value most—patient dignity, thoughtful decision-making, clear communication—are better able to manage disagreement without eroding trust.
Team cohesion is shaped less by grand initiatives and more by micro-behaviors that accumulate meaning. Brief acknowledgments, follow-ups after difficult cases, using names, closing communication loops, and expressing appreciation for speaking up all counteract the depersonalization that burnout thrives on. These actions take little time but carry disproportionate psychological weight.
Strong team spirit does not mean the absence of conflict. In fact, avoidance of disagreement often signals disengagement. Healthy teams tolerate tension and use it productively, separating critique of ideas from critique of people. When conflict is approached with curiosity rather than defensiveness, trust deepens rather than fractures. Repair after moments of friction becomes a sign of maturity, not failure.
Emotions move quickly through healthcare teams. Cynicism, irritability, and emotional withdrawal are as contagious as calm, gratitude, and steadiness. Team spirit requires awareness of what we transmit under stress. This does not mean suppressing difficult emotions, but metabolizing them in ways that do not burden others. Even brief moments of shared reflection or humor can function as pressure valves, protecting both individuals and the collective.
Burnout is often framed as an individual problem, yet it is profoundly relational. Isolation accelerates exhaustion; connection buffers it. Clinicians who feel seen, supported, and respected by their teams show greater resilience, even in high-intensity environments. While team spirit cannot fix systemic failures, it can reduce their psychological toll and help clinicians remain connected to meaning in their work.
For nurses and physicians, cultivating team spirit is not an extra task—it is a clinical skill. It requires attention, emotional intelligence, and intention. Like any skill, it strengthens with practice. In an era of increasing complexity, cohesive teams are not optional. They are integral to patient care.
When teams function well, patients sense it. Decisions improve. Errors decrease. And clinicians are more likely to remain engaged, resilient, and humane—toward both patients and one another.
Key Points Summary
- Team spirit is a clinical asset that directly affects patient safety, decision-making, and staff resilience
- Psychological safety enables clinicians to speak up, question, and share uncertainty without fear
- Small, everyday relational behaviors have a powerful cumulative impact on team cohesion
- Healthy teams tolerate and repair conflict rather than avoiding it
- Strong team connections buffer burnout and sustain meaning in clinical work
About the Author
Dr Gavril Hercz
Dr. Gavril Hercz is a nephrologist at Humber River Health and Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto. He completed his psychoanalytic training at the Toronto Psychoanalytic Institute and is a member of the Canadian Psychoanalytic Society. His major area of interest is the impact of physical illness on patients, families, and caregivers.
Under these conditions, “team spirit” can sound like a soft concept—nice in theory, unrealistic in practice.
